Compare

Andrei Jikh and Graham Stephan

Both records at the same windows, each against its own base rate; then every instrument both channels have called.

As of Nov 6, 2026, Callsight has checked both channels' calls at one year. Andrei Jikh: 57.1% of the 49 calls that have a comparable base rate were correct, against a base rate of 41.7%. Graham Stephan: 57.1% of the 84 calls that have a comparable base rate were correct, against a base rate of 47.2%. Every call links to the second it was said.

Choose two channels

The record at 1 year

Correct calls over correct plus incorrect, on the speaker's own calls, beside the base rate: how often the called move happened anyway in comparable past windows. The gap between the two, measured on the calls that have a base rate, is the edge, and it is the figure that can be read across markets.

Andrei Jikh@andreijikh · 3.3M subscribers · 267 videos read

Hit rate, 1 year

58.8%(51 calls)

30 correct · 21 incorrect (out of 51 checked calls)
After 3 years: 58.8% (34 calls) · on the 33 of 34 calls that have a base rate: 57.6% correct, base rate 48.7%

Above the base rate

+15.4pts

On the 49 of 51 calls with a comparable base rate: 57.1% correct, against a base rate of 41.7%.

Graham Stephan@grahamstephan · 5.1M subscribers · 862 videos read

Hit rate, 1 year

60.6%(104 calls)

63 correct · 41 incorrect (out of 104 checked calls)
After 3 years: 71.9% (89 calls) · on the 73 of 89 calls that have a base rate: 69.9% correct, base rate 51.9%

Above the base rate

+10.0pts

On the 84 of 104 calls with a comparable base rate: 57.1% correct, against a base rate of 47.2%.

Against its own base rate, on the calls that have one: Andrei Jikh +15.4 pts on 49 of 51 calls, Graham Stephan +10.0 pts on 84 of 104.

Most of Andrei Jikh's own calls and most of Graham Stephan's are about the economy. The two records below are measured largely on the same market.

Share correct at every window

30 days
44.9%49 callsbase rate 32.1% on 43 of them
50.5%97 callsbase rate 33.0% on 60 of them
90 days
47.1%51 callsbase rate 35.8% on 47 of them
51.9%106 callsbase rate 40.1% on 71 of them
180 days
53.1%49 callsbase rate 37.9% on 47 of them
58.8%102 callsbase rate 44.3% on 80 of them
1 year
58.8%51 callsbase rate 41.7% on 49 of them
60.6%104 callsbase rate 47.2% on 84 of them
3 years
58.8%34 callsbase rate 48.7% on 33 of them
71.9%89 callsbase rate 51.9% on 73 of them
5 years
0.0%1 callbase rate not yet measured
72.7%55 callsbase rate 54.3% on 39 of them
Hit rateBase rate

Bar: the share correct. Mark: the base rate of that channel's own calls. A window a record is not old enough for shows the date its first result can exist.

By market, at 1 year

Economy
62.1%29 callsbase rate 29.8% on 27 of them
63.0%73 callsbase rate 38.8% on 55 of them
Stocks & funds
60.0%10 callsbase rate 52.4% on 10 of them
66.7%21 callsbase rate 68.0% on 21 of them
Crypto
50.0%12 callsbase rate 59.7% on 12 of them
30.0%10 callsbase rate 50.0% on 8 of them

Each share beside the base rate of its own market. A market neither channel has made its own calls in is left out; one with calls but no result yet says so.

Of each channel's calls that were correct after 30 days, how many were still correct after a year - with the opposite movement beside it.

Still correct after 1 year: Andrei Jikh

Still correct after 1 year

8 of 13

Fewer than 20 calls have both results, so a count is shown and no percentage.
Over the same windows, 67.6% of 30-day moves in the same instruments were still in the same direction after 1 year (measured on 13 of 13 calls).
Correct after 30 days, still open at 1 year: 1

30 days → 1 year
30 days / 1 yearCorrect 1 yearIncorrect 1 year
Correct 30 days85
Incorrect 30 days45

Still correct after 1 year: Graham Stephan

Still correct after 1 year

9 of 16

Fewer than 20 calls have both results, so a count is shown and no percentage.
Over the same windows, 71.5% of 30-day moves in the same instruments were still in the same direction after 1 year (measured on 16 of 16 calls).
Correct after 30 days, still open at 1 year: 1

30 days → 1 year
30 days / 1 yearCorrect 1 yearIncorrect 1 year
Correct 30 days97
Incorrect 30 days47

Where their calls agree and where they do not

7 instruments in common

Every instrument both channels have made their own calls on: each channel's latest call, the day it was made, and how it turned out where the window has closed. Two calls are set against each other only when they were made at most 365 days apart. Most recently spoken first.

Where their calls agree and where they do not
InstrumentAndrei JikhGraham StephanAgreement
SPYcalls: 15 and 46
will fallAug 5, 2026 · Correct after 90 days
will fallJun 25, 2026 · Incorrect after 90 days
Same direction
BTCcalls: 38 and 24
will riseNov 21, 2025 · Not scored
no direction statedJun 17, 2026 · Not verifiable after 1 year
No direction to set against
USOcalls: 1 and 2
will riseJun 3, 2022 · Not verifiable after 1 year
will riseMay 18, 2026 · Incorrect after 90 days
Made more than 365 days apart: not compared
GMEcalls: 3 and 4
will fallJun 3, 2024 · Not scored
will fallFeb 8, 2021 · Incorrect after 1 year
Made more than 365 days apart: not compared
TSLAcalls: 1 and 8
will fallDec 23, 2022 · Incorrect after 1 year
will riseMay 23, 2022 · Not scored
Opposite directions
ETHcalls: 6 and 1
will riseApr 4, 2022 · Incorrect after 1 year
will riseJan 15, 2018 · Incorrect after 1 year
Made more than 365 days apart: not compared
DOGEcalls: 1 and 5
will rise to $1.00Jan 31, 2022 · Not scored
will fallApr 16, 2021 · Correct after 1 year
Opposite directions

Called in opposite directions within 45 days

The same instrument, one call up and one down, made at most 45 days apart - with what each one was worth at one year where that window has closed. The most recent disagreement on each instrument, newest first.

SPYSPDR S&P 500 ETFMade 41 days apart

Andrei JikhUp

“I think that's one of the main reasons why the stock market could be going up because the market is betting that they're going to pick devaluing the dollar and saving the bond market is the only way out.”

Watch at 28:20May 15, 2026Pending after 1 yearDetails and evidence

Graham StephanDown

“Historically, when the savings rate reaches an absolute low like this, the stock market tends to suffer in the years following. Now, I'm not saying that's a guarantee, but it's something at least worth considering.”

Watch at 10:37Jun 25, 2026Pending after 1 yearDetails and evidence

BTCBitcoinMade 19 days apart

Andrei JikhUp

“and less Supply equals higher price potential”

Watch at 6:49Mar 26, 2025Incorrect after 1 yearDetails and evidence

Graham StephanDown

“I bet there's going to be plenty of short-term spikes over these next few years that are really tempting to buy into because you're like oh my gosh this changes everything and then as it does every single time in the past it eventually subsides and prices fall back down”

Watch at 14:54Mar 7, 2025Correct after 1 yearDetails and evidence

Market stance: Andrei Jikh

The channel's own calls only. Up or down counts price calls and crash calls by the direction that was called.

Up 34 (60%)Down 20 (35%)No direction 3 (5%)

Predictions tracked

232

Not counted: 55 relayed from someone else, 74 own calls not scored

Judged calls

73

with a result at 30 days to a year

Share of vague calls

61%(302 calls)

(Of the channel's own calls, vague ones included, withheld ones left out)

Most called

Market stance: Graham Stephan

The channel's own calls only. Up or down counts price calls and crash calls by the direction that was called.

Up 77 (71%)Down 28 (26%)No direction 3 (3%)

Predictions tracked

550

Not counted: 169 relayed from someone else, 155 own calls not scored

Judged calls

163

with a result at 30 days to a year

Share of vague calls

53%(506 calls)

(Of the channel's own calls, vague ones included, withheld ones left out)

Most called

Hit rates count each distinct call once, however often it was repeated, and leave out calls that could not be checked. Methodology