Joseph Carlson: VICI will outperform

Said on Mar 30, 2023, at 27:22 in the video.

What was said
Joseph Carlson

@josephcarlsonshow

“I think the company is going to continue to compound for the next five years like it has when I look at the five-year chart it goes right along with the intrinsic value of the company compounding quite nicely above the rate of the market this company has been a wildly Market beating return and I think we'll see more of that in the future”
Watch at 27:22Michael Burry Just Gave Up - Why I'm Still Buying
PredictionVICIwill outperformby Mar 28, 2028
What happenedafter 1 year
Not verifiable

Not verifiable: comparison not supported. A call that one asset will beat another is not checked yet, and it is not judged as a plain rise or fall.

30 days

Not verifiable

90 days

Not verifiable

180 days

Not verifiable

1 year

Not verifiable

The window it was checked over

VICIWindow checked
$20$25$30$35$40202220232024202620272028Said on Mar 30, 2023
$20$25$30$352022202420262028Said on Mar 30, 2023

VICI closing prices, adjusted for splits. The shaded span is the one-year window: it starts at the first close after the video went public and ends at the last close on or before one year after the day the video was published.

Result at every window

All windows are shown, so none is picked
Result at every window
WindowResultAt the startAt the endChangeBenchmark
30 daysR-REL v4Not verifiable————
90 daysR-REL v4Not verifiable————
180 daysR-REL v4Not verifiable————
1 yearR-REL v4Not verifiable————
3 yearsR-REL v4Not verifiable————
5 yearsR-REL v4Not verifiable————
Stated deadlineR-REL v4Not verifiable————
Why: 30 days

Not verifiable: comparison not supported. A call that one asset will beat another is not checked yet, and it is not judged as a plain rise or fall.

Why: 90 days

Not verifiable: comparison not supported. A call that one asset will beat another is not checked yet, and it is not judged as a plain rise or fall.

Why: 180 days

Not verifiable: comparison not supported. A call that one asset will beat another is not checked yet, and it is not judged as a plain rise or fall.

Why: 1 year

Not verifiable: comparison not supported. A call that one asset will beat another is not checked yet, and it is not judged as a plain rise or fall.

Why: 3 years

Not verifiable: comparison not supported. A call that one asset will beat another is not checked yet, and it is not judged as a plain rise or fall.

Why: 5 years

Not verifiable: comparison not supported. A call that one asset will beat another is not checked yet, and it is not judged as a plain rise or fall.

Why: Stated deadline

Not verifiable: comparison not supported. A call that one asset will beat another is not checked yet, and it is not judged as a plain rise or fall.

What was said around it

tenant over time which makes Vichy less risky of a company as well now they're not directly linked even if Caesars could not pay rent they'd have to find a new renter it would be replaced by a different company and Vichy would probably still be able to collect some type of rent even in that scenario but I think that's the most probable risk to causing problems with Vichy properties I believe that Vichy is a high quality company I think the company is going to continue to compound for the next five years like it has when I look at the five-year chart it goes right along with the intrinsic value of the company compounding quite nicely above the rate of the market this company has been a wildly Market beating return and I think we'll see more of that in the future now number four we're going to be looking at Intel once again this is a stock that I've been following for a while now I've never bought into this company I've never actually pulled the trigger and bought any shares of it I always have some some things that hold me back but Intel has gone through a very difficult time the first thing I want to highlight is the price over the past couple of years on a 2 your basis Intel's down

What a person said is shown in their own words and is never translated. The link goes to the exact second in the video.

See all