Được nói ngày 21/10/2025, tại 17:32 trong video.
“And this could easily see a trillion dollars trying to squeeze through the same door at the exact same instant. The market would seize up with no buyers for the sellers and no sellers for the buyers.”Dự báo của người khác — không chấm
failed, that was their problem. Maybe they'd blow up. Maybe they drag down a few counterparties, but the damage was usually contained. Different firms had different strategies and different blind spots, making diversity a natural firewall. In Gendler's monoculture scenario, no model failure actually needs to occur. Instead, thousands of independent firms get the same signal at the same microcond. Their similar AI brains sees the same pattern, reach the same conclusion, and execute the same trade. And this could easily see a trillion dollars trying to squeeze through the same door at the exact same instant. The market would seize up with no buyers for the sellers and no sellers for the buyers. Just everyone trying to execute the same side of the same trade simultaneously. The flash crash of 2010 lasted all of 36 minutes before the market recovered. In Gensler's scenario, there would be no recovery because there'd be nobody left on the other side of the trade to buy the dip. Just thousands of AIs all executing the same sell order into the void. Each one programmed to be rational, creating an outcome that's completely insane. So, the algorithms are colluding, potentially crashing, and evolving
Lời của người nói được giữ nguyên văn và không bao giờ được dịch. Đường dẫn mở đúng giây đó trong video.
Graham StephanThị trường sụp đổsẽ không xảy ra
“Worst-case scenario is that investors get pushed to a point where it all unravels at once. But, given how Washington is closely monitoring the situation, I tend to believe that's probably not going to happen, and most likely this is going to blow over in a few weeks.”
03/08/2026 · sau 90 ngày
Andrei Jikhmột nhận định không rõ hướng
“So basically what we know is that every single time the yen got stronger really fast, it meant that markets somewhere in the world were starting to break.”
28/07/2026
Graham Stephan, dẫn lời Ed Yardeni: một nhận định không rõ hướng
“the veteran strategist Ed Yardeni, who's usually one of the most bullish people on the planet, recently raised his probability of a market meltdown to 35% citing the collision of the Iran oil shock with existing trade pressures.”
27/07/2026
Coin Bureaumột nhận định đang được xem xét lại
“the next major crypto collapse is unlikely to come from a regulator crackdown. It is going to come from a regulator that looked away while a politically connected firm built something it could not actually support.”
04/06/2026
Graham StephanThị trường sụp đổsẽ không xảy ra
“To me, the most realistic outcome here is not a sudden market crash that no one sees coming, but instead a slow constriction of the”
18/05/2026 · sau 90 ngày
Coin BureauThị trường sụp đổ— không chấm: quy tắc chỉ đọc thị trường chứng khoán Mỹ nói chung
“Or are we watching the slow-motion opening of a 2022 style cascade where the largest concentrated holder of an asset eventually becomes the trigger for the next major leg lower?”
09/05/2026 · sau 1 năm
