Joseph Carlson: a call with no clear direction

Said on Dec 18, 2023, at 27:10 in the video.

What was said
Joseph Carlson

@josephcarlsonshow

“I don't believe this is a long-term problem for the stock this seems like a temporary issue now we also got some breaking news that adobe and figma call off their $20 billion acquisition because of”
Watch at 27:10Top Ten Deep Value Stocks For 2024
Predictiona call with no clear direction
What happened
Not scored

The direction of this call could not be determined with confidence, so it is held out of the score.

The window it was checked over

AAPLWindow checked
$160$180$200$220$240$260$280Jun 2023Oct 2023Feb 2024Jun 2024Oct 2024Feb 2025Said on Dec 18, 2023
$150$200$250$300Jun 2023Jan 2024Jul 2024Feb 2025Said on Dec 18, 2023

AAPL closing prices, adjusted for splits. The shaded span is the one-year window: it starts at the first close after the video went public and ends at the last close on or before one year after the day the video was published.

Result at every window

All windows are shown, so none is picked

The direction of this call could not be determined with confidence, so it is held out of the score.

What was said around it

Apple infringed on its pulse oximetry Tech this particular import ban is the result of the latter I've highlighted many times that the reason I don't invest in pharmaceutical companies is because of the regulatory envir environment it's incredibly difficult to bring a new drug to Market it's incredibly risky with the amount of lawsuits or recalls that can happen with pharmaceutical companies so it makes sense that as Apple Ventures into Healthcare they're going to run into these regulatory disputes I don't believe this is a long-term problem for the stock this seems like a temporary issue now we also got some breaking news that adobe and figma call off their $20 billion acquisition because of regulatory scrutiny when I look at this there's two ways to interpret it the first one is the view that this deal was overpriced to begin with and Adobe is better off not doing it instead returning that $20 billion to investors I think that's one take and I do believe that that's probably better in the short term but in my long-term view of adobe I think it was better that they own figma what it does when they own figma is they both get the extra revenue and the earnings that figma's generating as

What a person said is shown in their own words and is never translated. The link goes to the exact second in the video.

See all