Joseph Carlson: DPZ will rise

Said on Mar 30, 2022, at 22:48 in the video.

What was said
Joseph Carlson

@josephcarlsonshow

“i expect their earnings growth to continue at a very brisk pace they're going to have 12 percent eps gains i think for the very long term future”
Watch at 22:48I Just Bought A New Stock
PredictionDPZwill riseChecked at fixed windows, from 30 days to 5 years
What happenedafter 1 year
Not verifiable

Not verifiable: target not a price. The target was recorded as a percentage (a growth rate, a return or a multiple), not as a price of DPZ.

30 days

Not verifiable

90 days

Not verifiable

180 days

Not verifiable

1 year

Not verifiable

The window it was checked over

DPZWindow checked
$200$300$400$500$600202120222023202320242025Said on Mar 30, 2022
$200$300$400$500$6002021202220242025Said on Mar 30, 2022

DPZ closing prices, adjusted for splits. The shaded span is the one-year window: it starts at the first close after the video went public and ends at the last close on or before one year after the day the video was published.

Result at every window

All windows are shown, so none is picked
Result at every window
WindowResultAt the startAt the endChangeBenchmark
30 daysR-PT v4Not verifiable————
90 daysR-PT v4Not verifiable————
180 daysR-PT v4Not verifiable————
1 yearR-PT v4Not verifiable————
3 yearsR-PT v4Not verifiable————
5 yearsR-PT v4Not verifiable————
Why: 30 days

Not verifiable: target not a price. The target was recorded as a percentage (a growth rate, a return or a multiple), not as a price of DPZ.

Why: 90 days

Not verifiable: target not a price. The target was recorded as a percentage (a growth rate, a return or a multiple), not as a price of DPZ.

Why: 180 days

Not verifiable: target not a price. The target was recorded as a percentage (a growth rate, a return or a multiple), not as a price of DPZ.

Why: 1 year

Not verifiable: target not a price. The target was recorded as a percentage (a growth rate, a return or a multiple), not as a price of DPZ.

Why: 3 years

Not verifiable: target not a price. The target was recorded as a percentage (a growth rate, a return or a multiple), not as a price of DPZ.

Why: 5 years

Not verifiable: target not a price. The target was recorded as a percentage (a growth rate, a return or a multiple), not as a price of DPZ.

What was said around it

trades well above this p e ratio in fact on average dominoes trade somewhere above a 30 trades between a 30 and a 32 sometimes it gets as high as a 38 or 39 ford pe this is a company that's gotten all the way up to a 40 ford p e ratio so when i look at this and i try to determine does dominoes have more upside or more downside i think historically looking it has far more upside the growth of dominoes remains very strong the mode of the company remains very strong they still have a huge leg up over all of their competitors and i expect their earnings growth to continue at a very brisk pace they're going to have 12 percent eps gains i think for the very long term future so when i look at the upside and downside and i look at it historically i see a lot more upside right now than downside there is a chance that dominoes could lose their lead and maybe it would trade down to 2013 levels but i think that's very unlikely when i look at the potential downside there's only a few times in its history it's ever gone down that much and i think the reason that the p e ratio right now is as low as it currently is is because of the scary environment we're in we have high inflation we have increasing

What a person said is shown in their own words and is never translated. The link goes to the exact second in the video.

See all