Joseph Carlson: QQQ will underperform

Said on Feb 27, 2023, at 26:07 in the video.

What was said
Joseph Carlson

@josephcarlsonshow

“I think the days of people beating the market by just investing in Tech are going to be over and we're going to go to a new paradigm”
Watch at 26:07The CEO Is Fired - Why The Stock Could Double Now | Ep. 307
PredictionQQQwill underperformChecked at fixed windows, from 30 days to 5 years

Recorded as Tech, a word for a group: this call is judged on QQQ, the stand-in the method assigns to it.

What happenedafter 1 year
Not verifiable

Not verifiable: comparison not supported. A call that one asset will beat another is not checked yet, and it is not judged as a plain rise or fall.

30 days

Not verifiable

90 days

Not verifiable

180 days

Not verifiable

1 year

Not verifiable

The window it was checked over

QQQWindow checked
$250$300$350$400$450$500Sep 2022Dec 2022Apr 2023Aug 2023Dec 2023Apr 2024Said on Feb 27, 2023
$250$300$350$400$450$500Sep 2022Mar 2023Oct 2023Apr 2024Said on Feb 27, 2023

QQQ closing prices, adjusted for splits. The shaded span is the one-year window: it starts at the first close after the video went public and ends at the last close on or before one year after the day the video was published.

Result at every window

All windows are shown, so none is picked
Result at every window
WindowResultAt the startAt the endChangeBenchmark
30 daysR-REL v4Not verifiable————
90 daysR-REL v4Not verifiable————
180 daysR-REL v4Not verifiable————
1 yearR-REL v4Not verifiable————
3 yearsR-REL v4Not verifiable————
5 yearsR-REL v4Not verifiable————
Why: 30 days

Not verifiable: comparison not supported. A call that one asset will beat another is not checked yet, and it is not judged as a plain rise or fall.

Why: 90 days

Not verifiable: comparison not supported. A call that one asset will beat another is not checked yet, and it is not judged as a plain rise or fall.

Why: 180 days

Not verifiable: comparison not supported. A call that one asset will beat another is not checked yet, and it is not judged as a plain rise or fall.

Why: 1 year

Not verifiable: comparison not supported. A call that one asset will beat another is not checked yet, and it is not judged as a plain rise or fall.

Why: 3 years

Not verifiable: comparison not supported. A call that one asset will beat another is not checked yet, and it is not judged as a plain rise or fall.

Why: 5 years

Not verifiable: comparison not supported. A call that one asset will beat another is not checked yet, and it is not judged as a plain rise or fall.

What was said around it

have been rewarded for taking on risk with low interest rates higher risk meant higher reward and the valuations got pushed up further and further the company's fundamentals got weaker and weaker just taking on risk was rewarded and he believes that this is changing and just like others have said just like Terry Smith just like Howard marks he doesn't think we're returning right back to where we were anytime soon assuming that we take the FED at its word which is obviously questionable and rates will stay higher for much longer I think the days of people beating the market by just investing in Tech are going to be over and we're going to go to a new paradigm which I'm not 100 sure what that's going to be because we won't really know until we get there but I think it's going to I mean there'll still be tech stocks to invest in but I think the days of investing in companies that have no earnings or have multiples of 200 times will be gone there'll be a lot of more themes like infrastructure maybe greenification bringing back onshoring of of the industrial sector in the United States it's not clear yet but I think that's where the Market's going to go so he's more confident what he doesn't

What a person said is shown in their own words and is never translated. The link goes to the exact second in the video.

See all