Said on Feb 27, 2023, at 18:46 in the video.
“but I think we do have a realistic potential of a stock doubling here over the next two years”Not verifiable: target not a price. The target was recorded as a percentage (a growth rate, a return or a multiple), not as a price of UNP.
30 days
Not verifiable
90 days
Not verifiable
180 days
Not verifiable
1 year
Not verifiable
UNP closing prices, adjusted for splits. The shaded span is the one-year window: it starts at the first close after the video went public and ends at the last close on or before one year after the day the video was published.
| Window | Result | At the start | At the end | Change | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 daysR-PT v4 | Not verifiable | — | — | — | — |
| 90 daysR-PT v4 | Not verifiable | — | — | — | — |
| 180 daysR-PT v4 | Not verifiable | — | — | — | — |
| 1 yearR-PT v4 | Not verifiable | — | — | — | — |
| 3 yearsR-PT v4 | Not verifiable | — | — | — | — |
| 5 yearsR-PT v4 | Not verifiable | — | — | — | — |
| Stated deadlineR-PT v4 | Not verifiable | — | — | — | — |
Not verifiable: target not a price. The target was recorded as a percentage (a growth rate, a return or a multiple), not as a price of UNP.
Not verifiable: target not a price. The target was recorded as a percentage (a growth rate, a return or a multiple), not as a price of UNP.
Not verifiable: target not a price. The target was recorded as a percentage (a growth rate, a return or a multiple), not as a price of UNP.
Not verifiable: target not a price. The target was recorded as a percentage (a growth rate, a return or a multiple), not as a price of UNP.
Not verifiable: target not a price. The target was recorded as a percentage (a growth rate, a return or a multiple), not as a price of UNP.
Not verifiable: target not a price. The target was recorded as a percentage (a growth rate, a return or a multiple), not as a price of UNP.
Not verifiable: target not a price. The target was recorded as a percentage (a growth rate, a return or a multiple), not as a price of UNP.
leadership looks better if the Outlook looks better so if investors become more positive with their sentiment on Union Pacific we could see both earnings growth and multiple expansion at the same time so overall I agree I think there is a chance for over 100 returns over the next two years with this company I think it comes from a low starting point of a 16 Ford PE in an industry that's a really incredible industry and even if it falls short of this even if we get 30 per year and it returns 70 80 percent over the next two years that would be fine but I think we do have a realistic potential of a stock doubling here over the next two years so as far as I'm concerned I'm happy about this hedge fund pushing for changes in both the safety and the operating performance of Union Pacific and I'll be paying attention and seeing if they put in gymvana as the new CEO if they do I'll likely add even more to my position right now I consider Union Pacific to be widely undervalued even despite today's 10 percent stock price bump now moving on we have another company my portfolio Apple that has some pretty big news not only is it reported that they're winning over gen Z gen Z is like the older teenagers
What a person said is shown in their own words and is never translated. The link goes to the exact second in the video.
Joseph Carlson, relaying another source: UNP will rise
“sorban believes that with the Best in Class leadership Union in Pacific stock has the potential the potential to double over the next two years increasing market capitalization by 67 billion dollars”
Jul 26, 2023
Joseph CarlsonUNPwill rise
“so overall I agree I think there is a chance for over 100 returns over the next two years with this company”
Feb 27, 2023 · after 1 year
Joseph CarlsonUNPwill rise
“I also believe that Union Pacific has the chance to double in price over the next couple of years of course there's no guarantees but this is the argument that this hedge fund is making”
Feb 27, 2023 · after 1 year