Andrei Jikh, relaying another source: a call with no clear direction

The window it was checked over

GLD closing prices, adjusted for splits. The shaded span is the one-year window: it starts at the first close after the video went public and ends at the last close on or before one year after the day the video was published.

What was said around it

places like Bank of America, for example, and what they're saying is that the amount of gold that should be held in reserves should be closer to about 30%. Now, that's a 10% difference. Doesn't sound like much, but across the entire global financial system, that is estimated to be about $2 trillion worth of new demand. Now, gold is not like the dollar, right? you can't print more of it. So that $2 trillion of new demand could translate to a much much higher price of gold than we've ever seen before. Some people say that in 5 years we could see gold at double what it is today. Now I'm not personally making that prediction, but that is a very possible reality and it wouldn't surprise me. So then the question is how will this affect investors and specifically something like Bitcoin? So when you look at this chess game that's being played through this perspective, at least to me, it makes a lot of sense why something like gold or something like Bitcoin could have been suppressed in price for so long. Like if I were a country interested in both options as a possible alternative, why would I want the price of any of it to skyrocket until I had huge amounts of control over it? So I think

What a person said is shown in their own words and is never translated. The link goes to the exact second in the video.